Ex-Guardsman: I Contacted Kerry Campaign

OK, I've said it before, and it appears I'll be saying it again now and more between now and 11/2. Any time someone has a PERSONAL grudge against someone, any "evidence" brought by them against the person they have a grudge with, should be considered TAINTED until proven otherwise, not considered AUTHENTIC and TRUTHFUL until proven tainted. Also, a question about consequences. Should Burkett or his lawyer (Van Os) or both be implicated in this as a "conspiracy" to comitt fraud (IE - FORGING GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS) and thereby to influence a Presidential election, what then? Will they be tried for the FELONY they committed? Probably not, and that is the problem. If one or both of them is found to be the one (and I mean that we will know 100% FOR CERTAIN it was one or both of them) who created these documents and sent them to C-BS, they need to be tried and convicted. If the DNC (up to and including the Kerry campaign staff) knew, and did nothing, they are all guilty too. That would be reason to impeach a President and select his replacement (in this case, GW), but you know none of that will happen, now don't you.

Differences in Documents

OK, like other posts here, I'm not going to ramble on and on about this. I'll just make a few points then leave it to you.

1. The military (and YES the Natl. Guard IS part of the military) does not allow it's members to format memos any way they choose.
2. There is no such thing as "FAKE, but accurate"
3. The ONE point here is the signature line, those are NEVER deviated from, and viewing the signature from the req. for discharge vs the C-BS memo, aside from
any other "problem" with it, C-BS's MEMOS ARE FAKE! Therefore, they are totally IN-ACCURATE!